Friday, December 17, 2010

Epiphanies

The time has gone SO FAST.  Its three sleeps before the surgery.  I’m not ready for Christmas, I’m not ready at work, I’m not ready to be away, I’m not DONE.  Too bad, time’s almost up.  
The closer it gets the more I see deep meaning in the things around me.  Such as these:   
Sudden Intuitive Realization #1:  Did you ever think that liposuction wasn’t worth the effort because of the 8% of body weight restriction???  I always dismissed it as a sucky, stupid, pointless surgery because who would bother with an anaesthetic just  to have 8.4 lbs of fat sucked out.  Just get off your ass and lose the 8.4 lbs. It was pointed out to me this evening that most people weigh more than 105 lbs.  Mind-bending huh Thumper?   I’m struggling a bit to absorb it, but apparently far more people weigh 150 lbs and could have 12 pounds of fat sucked out, more again weigh 200 lbs could have 16 pounds of fat sucked out...on it goes.  So essentially the fatter you are, the better off you are when it comes to liposuctionable volumes. 
It is vital that you not confuse fatbastardness as being based only on body weight, rather than the weight-to-frame ratio.  105 lbs on a small frame can be just as morbidly obese as 578 lbs can be on a large frame.  (YES IT CAN, SHUT UP).  I don’t discount lipo as a superior way of losing 8.4 lbs as a part of another surgery.  To me it would be pointless as a stand-alone but I will love my surgeon forever if he whips out a cannula and sucks 8.4 lbs of grotesque fat out of me while I’m cut open anyway. 
Think about it.  A pound of fat on our bodies is substantially similar to a pound of any other animal fat, like a pound of butter.  Except the pound of human fat would be a little bigger from lymph and blood supply.  Imagine stacking up 8.4 lbs of butter – pretty disgusting huh?  “But you’re not fat” certain of you will say.  You’d be kind of WRONG if the surgeon sucks out fat, n’est-ce pas? 
The Math, Updated:  Granted he might not, but just imagine that the surgeon liposuctions me (when you wish upon a star).  I’d be up 1.3 lbs worth of implants, but down say 5 lbs of skin and subcutaneous fat AND down 8.4 malevolent pounds of other fat.  It’d be a net loss of 12.1 pounds.  Stack up 12.1 pounds of mental butter?  You know I’d look a.m.a.z.i.n.g., don’t lie.
Sudden Intuitive Realization #2:  Post op depression is said to be tremendously common among whiners, all surgical aftercare instructions warn of it.  Usually it is associated with mobility restrictions, higher levels of pain / swelling / bruising than expected, a slower-than-anticipated recovery period, skewed surgical outcome expectations, body dysmorphic disorder and similar.  I RESPECTFULLY SUGGEST THAT THIS IS CRAP.  The real reason that people are depressed is because of the 4-week embargo on drinking and taking recreational street drugs.  There’d be no depression if people were partying Hoff style to celebrate their new bodies.  Bruising goes, swelling goes...what‘s to be depressed about?  Don’t expect any of that bitching and complaining from me.
Love, kisses, three sleeps.
CVK

4 comments:

  1. Obesity is defined at a BMI > 30. At 105 lbs you would have to be 4'2" tall to qualify as obese. Dwarfism is defined at an adult height less than 4'10". So unless you are short for a dwarf (which you aren't) you are not obese. So shut it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In response to CS, I would suggest that the BMI has been widely and conclusively demonstrated to be bullshit of the highest order, including in the Journal of the American Medical Association. See the fat f*cks at http://kateharding.net/bmi-illustrated/ - YES, Joy IS obese, terrifyingly so. And I AM a short dwarf, when have you ever seen me without heels? I could be 4'2".

    Signed,

    YL&M
    Foamy the Squirrel
    :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dismissing liposuction as "sucky" seems redundant.

    Arguments about BMI aside, it seems unreasonable to choose to add breast implants for the purpose of making yourself larger, and then immediately turn around and demand that the resultant mass increase be counteracted with a reduction in your more "homegrown" mass. It seems to me that your scale should be recalibrated to automatically subtract the inserted additional mass. The addition of this silica gel, after all, is actually causing an overall decrease in the percentage of your personal mass that is your "fat content".

    I would also caution against removal of that which you obsess over, for that would most likely result in redirection of (not removal of) the obsessive tendency. Better the devil you know.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I feel that rocking the fat look is a lifestyle that does not deserve such riducule and shame that has been expressed in this post. Frankly one must accept the morbidly obese and superfat as rolemodels and inspirations. For example... Had these courageous and outrageous fat freaks not existed who would then look at them and say " oh hell no that is not happening to me" So you see... while you ridicule their enormous existence you are also inspired by them to have this surgery.
    Signed...
    A closet superfattie.

    ReplyDelete